Almost a year after those fabulous Researchers astonished us all by revealing the shocking, shocking news that bullying hurts kids, the intrepid investigative reporters at the nation's Paper Of Record have done the same.
This was reported a couple of days ago, and I would have posted it then, except that stories like this make me see red, and what with the surgery and all, I have to go lie down for a while after I read them. What makes me maddest here aren't the bullies; they exist, and they beat up kids for no reason. We all know that. Even the Researchers know that. What makes me mad here are the school officials, who punish the victim for fighting back, and let the bullies get away with a pat on the back.
This makes me hopping mad to read about, but it doesn't surprise me. Grownups* never really mean it when they say they want to Do Something about bullying. They'd much rather sit back and pretend it doesn't happen. I guess it's no fun trying to gather enough evidence to prosecute so many popular kids for assault, only to have them either win the case or get a teeny tiny juvenile sentence. Whatever. The school district doesn't have the time or the energy to stop the bullying. Sure. But what I don't get is why they punish the victim for fighting back.
**
Ms. Wolfe remembers the family dentist sewing up the inside of Billy’s cheek, and a school official refusing to call the police, saying it looked like Billy got what he deserved.
**
Not long after, a boy on the school bus pummeled Billy, but somehow Billy was the one suspended, despite his pleas that the bus’s security camera would prove his innocence. Days later, Ms. Wolfe recalls, the principal summoned her, presented a box of tissues, and played the bus video that clearly showed Billy was telling the truth.
**
Isn't that what grownups think kids ought to do? Isn't that why some people send their bullied kids to tae kwon do or karate classes, so that they can defend themselves against the bullies when the school district won't? Why does Billy get suspended or blown off by the school officials when he defends himself? Why do his parents have to file a lawsuit against the bullies themselves?
Do grownups really like bullies after all? Do they really want the bullied kids to be hurt? How does someone like that get to be a school official anyway?
*Yes, I'm thirty-one and a half years old, but in this matter, I refuse to call myself a grownup. I refuse to ally myself with those despicable adults in charge of school districts.
This was reported a couple of days ago, and I would have posted it then, except that stories like this make me see red, and what with the surgery and all, I have to go lie down for a while after I read them. What makes me maddest here aren't the bullies; they exist, and they beat up kids for no reason. We all know that. Even the Researchers know that. What makes me mad here are the school officials, who punish the victim for fighting back, and let the bullies get away with a pat on the back.
This makes me hopping mad to read about, but it doesn't surprise me. Grownups* never really mean it when they say they want to Do Something about bullying. They'd much rather sit back and pretend it doesn't happen. I guess it's no fun trying to gather enough evidence to prosecute so many popular kids for assault, only to have them either win the case or get a teeny tiny juvenile sentence. Whatever. The school district doesn't have the time or the energy to stop the bullying. Sure. But what I don't get is why they punish the victim for fighting back.
**
Ms. Wolfe remembers the family dentist sewing up the inside of Billy’s cheek, and a school official refusing to call the police, saying it looked like Billy got what he deserved.
**
Not long after, a boy on the school bus pummeled Billy, but somehow Billy was the one suspended, despite his pleas that the bus’s security camera would prove his innocence. Days later, Ms. Wolfe recalls, the principal summoned her, presented a box of tissues, and played the bus video that clearly showed Billy was telling the truth.
**
Isn't that what grownups think kids ought to do? Isn't that why some people send their bullied kids to tae kwon do or karate classes, so that they can defend themselves against the bullies when the school district won't? Why does Billy get suspended or blown off by the school officials when he defends himself? Why do his parents have to file a lawsuit against the bullies themselves?
Do grownups really like bullies after all? Do they really want the bullied kids to be hurt? How does someone like that get to be a school official anyway?
*Yes, I'm thirty-one and a half years old, but in this matter, I refuse to call myself a grownup. I refuse to ally myself with those despicable adults in charge of school districts.
- Music:March Of The Women


Comments
There are grownup bullies too.
I'm a governor at a local primary school (ages 5-11) and the children there feel there is very little bullying, and what there is is dealt with immediately. I just hope we don't become complacent.
The bullies *know* they won't get away with it, and the victims know they'll be listened to. The system isn't perfect, but it helps.
Looking around the interweb, sometimes I find lots of evidence of people eventually turning ... callous.
When "I don't do nice" becomes an accolade and someone who feels hurt by a flame is being ridiculed and flamers are being worshipped as people who "cleanse" the internet of badfic.
"Bullies are everywhere". "Life is unfair". "They never promised you a rose garden".
Just grow up.
You know? If that's what being grown up means? I'm so with you: I'll happily remain a kid.
People can have all the issues they want -- I had issues, probably still have them, you had issues -- but we did not go around beating other kids to a pulp. Kids are surely allowed to have issues, but they should not be allowed to deal with those issues by beating up other kids, as so many of them are allowed to do. I find it incredibly irresponsible that apparently not one single person in that entire school has the credentials or the training to deal with this kind of situation, even if "dealing with it" might involve calling the police to arrest the bullies for assault and battery.
Jumpin' Jesus on a pogo stick, there is even cell phone video of an attack on that poor kid.
After awhile, knowing I'd done nothing, said nothing, I just figured there was something WRONG/BAD/DIFFERENT about me. I hated myself. I often wished I was dead. No kid should have to feel that way.
Popular kids and their cliques can be some of the WORST...and the teachers still adore them. Treat them like little princes and princesses, even JOIN the bullying sometimes, with snarky comments to their victims as well. Been there, done that, too.
Assault is assault. If someone is getting beaten, it should ALWAYS go to the police.
Sorry. You got my hot-button. :) I LOATHE bullies. It took my taking on a scary, CRAZY persona in highschool just to end the PHYSICAL part. The words continued, but I could by then at least fight back on that. I actually got very good at it. But then, hearing that you're a pig 50 times a day every day from whoever feels like saying it? You either get good at slamming back with a better response, or just curl up and die.
-Dira-
I bet that these are the same people who like to point out miniskirt-wearing rape victims in court.
(Been there, done that, too.)
-Dira-
What really bothers me about schools' mishandling of bullying is that it often gets perilously close to child abuse-by-proxy. First you have a child singled out for humiliation, not to mention the physical injury which can be quite extensive on its own. Then you have an adult in authority tell the kid (or imply) that they must have done something to deserve it. If a parent hit, humiliated, and blamed a child he'd go to jail. (Or any adult, including the principal, if the principal did the hitting.) Yes, I know the principal isn't the one actually doing the hitting, but from the child's POV it's all rolled into one hurtful incident, and the principal's reaction compounds what the bully does and lends it legitimacy.
So yeah, I definitely think that this shouldn't happen. Even if life is unfair, shouldn't small children be cushioned from that? Because a primary-school kid probably doesn't have the emotional resources to deal with this situation.
Btw, on the remaining-a-kid thing: I keep saying that hobbits didn't come of age until 33 and so I have full license to behave like a tweenager until then. And when I reach that point I'll claim the LACE factoid that elves were juveniles until 50. :-)
the LACE factoid that elves were juveniles until 50.
And if you go by the reasoning that one is only as old as one acts . . . well, the seven sons of a certain Noldor craftself could be said to have been kids their entire lives.
Edited at 2008-03-28 03:29 pm (UTC)
And agreed that it often does come close in any event.